Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism

Logo poskytovatele

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Fakultu sportovních studií, ale pod Právnickou fakultu. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

PIVODA Marek

Rok publikování 2023
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Právnická fakulta

Citace
www Open access článku
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15
Klíčová slova constitutional courts; ECJ; preliminary references; Article 267 TFEU; deliberative democracy; market capitalism; legitimacy
Popis This Article interrogates the role of national constitutional courts within the Article 267 TFEU preliminary reference mechanism from both descriptive and normative angles. First, I demonstrate that although a clear majority of the constitutional courts submit references to the ECJ on a more frequent basis, differences in individual approaches remain significant. Subsequently, I argue that the core normative attractivity of the questions submitted in the course of domestic constitutional review lies in their participative and deliberative potential. Compared to ordinary courts, constitutional courts are better suited to amplify the ‘unheard’ voices of immobile EU citizens. By counterbalancing the demands of the EU's functional constitution, which is primarily based on the ideals of market capitalism, constitutional courts’ questions may contribute to the EU's capacity to generate legitimate decisions. Finally, I put my theoretical claims in context and analyse the main ways in which such deliberative potential can translate into practice.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info