Sagitální profil páteře u pacientů po stabilizačních operacích bederní páteře

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Sports Studies. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.

Title in English	Sagittal Profile of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries
Authors	PEŠEK Jan REPKO Martin RYBA Luděk MATEJIČKA Dušan
Year of publication	2024
Type	Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source	Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca
MU Faculty or unit	Faculty of Medicine
Citation
Web	https://achot.cz/artkey/ach-202401-0002_sagittal-profile-of-the-spine-in-patients-after-lumbar-stabilisation-surgeries.php
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/001
Keywords	sagittal profile; spine stabilization; pelvic tilt; pelvic incidence; sagittal vertical axis; SVA
Description	In 38 of 50 patients, who at the end of the follow-up period did not have the PI-LL (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) mismatch, i.e. PI-LL was ?10°, a statistically significant difference in pelvic tilt (p=0.049) and sagittal vertical axis (p<0.001) was reported, which was not the case in the remaining patients of the study population. Claudication and OSWESTRY (ODI) showed no statistically significant difference. We have also compared the differences in the number of fused vertebrae and type of stabilization. A significant change was seen in the claudication parameter at 12 and 24 months after surgery (p=0.007, p=0.005), with better outcomes achieved by 360° lumbar fusion compared to posterior lumbar fusion. The improvement of VAS and ODI scores in both the groups over time (from 6.1 to 3.6 or from 6.3 to 3.5 in VAS and from 62 to 32, or from 62 to 30 in ODI) was also statistically significant (p<0.001 in both groups), while when comparing the groups against each other it was statistically insignificant. The authors confirmed significant improvement in the studied clinical parameters in all groups of patients (VAS, ODI, claudication), which is consistent with the results of recently published papers. The authors also established the correlation between different radiological parameters in the studied groups. The results do not confirm the importance of the length or type of instrumentation for the clinical outcomes. This is consistent with the findings of other published manuscripts. The authors failed to confirm a significant change in clinical parameters in dependence on the matching relationship between the pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.