Neuroplasticity in Motor Learning Under Variable and Constant Practice Conditions-Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors | |
---|---|
Year of publication | 2022 |
Type | Article in Periodical |
Magazine / Source | FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE |
MU Faculty or unit | |
Citation | |
Web | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.773730/full |
Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.773730 |
Keywords | sensorimotor cortex activity; neuroplasticity; specificity of practice; variability of practice; practice conditions; motor learning |
Attached files | |
Description | Background:& nbsp;There is numerous literature on mechanisms underlying variability of practice advantages. Literature includes both behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Unfortunately, no studies are focusing on practice in constant conditions to the best of our knowledge. Hence it is essential to assess possible differences in mechanisms of neuroplasticity between constant vs. variable practice conditions. The primary objectives of the study described in this protocol will be: (1) to determine the brain's structural and functional changes following constant and variable practice conditions in motor learning (structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging, MRI); (2) to determine the EEG activation and connectivity between cognitive, sensory, and motor cerebral cortex areas (central, temporal, parietal, occipital) in constant and variable practice conditions and as a function of practice time.Methods:& nbsp;The study will follow the interventional (experimental) design with two arms (parallel groups). Fifty participants will be randomly assigned to two groups practicing in constant (CG) and variable conditions (VG). CG will be practicing only one pattern of step isometric contractions during unimanual index finger abduction, i.e., 90 trials in all training sessions, whereas VG will practice three different patterns. Each will be practiced 30 times per session in variable conditions. Resting-state fMRI, EEG (cortical networking), and motor task proficiency will be examined before (pre-) and after practice (post- and retentions tests).Discussion:& nbsp;Findings will enhance our understanding of structural and functional neural changes following practice in constant and variable conditions. Therefore, the study can be considered pure (basic) research (clinical research in healthy individuals). |