Metabolic responses of Ulva compressa to single and combined heavy metals

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Sports Studies. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

KOVACIK Jozef MICALIZZI Giuseppe DRESLER Slawomir BABULA Petr HLADKY Juraj CHEMODANOV Alexander MONDELLO Luigi

Year of publication 2018
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Chemosphere
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.141
Keywords Antioxidants; Fluorescence microscopy; Gas chromatography; Heavy metals
Description Accumulation of metals and metabolic responses were studied for two Cd and Cu concentrations (1 and 10 mu M) either alone or as a combination in marine macroalga after 7 days of exposure. Cd accumulated more at a low dose (115 mu g of Cclig DW) but Cu at a high dose (378 mu g of Cu/g DW); Cu suppressed Cd accumulation (by 57%). Na and Zn levels were unaffected, but higher metal doses depleted K and Ca levels. Higher metal concentrations strongly stimulated reactive oxygen species and depleted nitric oxide (NO) formation, but differences between the action of Cd and Cu were not extensive. Higher metal doses increased cell wall thickness with a potential relation to NO signal that is visible mainly in the apoplast in those treatments. A higher Cu dose depleted proline, ascorbic acid, and phenol levels more than Cd, whereas Cd elevated nonprotein thiols and ascorbic acid in combined treatments. An eventual role of malic or citric acid in metal chelation was not evident: malic acid level decreased in all treatments. The total content of fatty acids reached 16.7 mg/g DW in control with the quantitative order of PUFAs > SFAs > MUFAs; palmitic, vaccenic, linoleic, and alpha-linolenic acids were the major compounds. Cu was more toxic for fatty acids than Cd (even at 1 mu M); mainly, PUFA levels strongly decreased (from 43% of total acids in control to 28.9% and 5.4% at 1 and 10 mu M Cu treatment, respectively). Results are precisely and critically discussed in relation to limited literature focused on macroalgae, and a comparison with microalgae is also provided. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info