On Evaluation of Natural Language Processing Tasks: Is Gold Standard Evaluation Methodology a Good Solution?

Investor logo
Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Sports Studies. It includes Faculty of Informatics. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

KOVÁŘ Vojtěch JAKUBÍČEK Miloš HORÁK Aleš

Year of publication 2016
Type Article in Proceedings
Conference Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Informatics

Citation
Field Informatics
Keywords Natural Language Processing; Applications; Evaluation
Description The paper discusses problems in state of the art evaluation methods used in natural language processing (NLP). Usually, some form of gold standard data is used for evaluation of various NLP tasks, ranging from morphological annotation to semantic analysis. We discuss problems and validity of this type of evaluation, for various tasks, and illustrate the problems on examples. Then we propose using application-driven evaluations, wherever it is possible. Although it is more expensive, more complicated and not so precise, it is the only way to find out if a particular tool is useful at all.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info