Nonlinear vs. linear biasing in Trp-cage folding simulations

Investor logo
Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Sports Studies. It includes Institute of Computer Science. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

SPIWOK Vojtěch OBORSKÝ Pavel PAZÚRIKOVÁ Jana KŘENEK Aleš KRÁLOVÁ Blanka

Year of publication 2015
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Journal of the chemical society. Faraday transactions II, Journal of chemical physics
MU Faculty or unit

Institute of Computer Science

Citation
Web http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jcp/142/11/10.1063/1.4914828
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4914828
Field Biochemistry
Keywords molecular metadynamics; protein folding
Description Biased simulations have great potential for the study of slow processes, including protein folding. Atomic motions in molecules are nonlinear, which suggests that simulations with enhanced sampling of collective motions traced by nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods may perform better than linear ones. In this study, we compare an unbiased folding simulation of the Trp-cage miniprotein with metadynamics simulations using both linear (principle component analysis) and nonlinear (Isomap) low dimensional embeddings as collective variables. Folding of the mini-protein was successfully simulated in 200 ns simulation with linear biasing and non-linear motion biasing. The folded state was correctly predicted as the free energy minimum in both simulations. We found that the advantage of linear motion biasing is that it can sample a larger conformational space, whereas the advantage of nonlinear motion biasing lies in slightly better resolution of the resulting free energy surface. In terms of sampling efficiency, both methods are comparable.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info